Compare / head-to-head
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GLM-4.7 is 2.1x cheaper per token. Both offer a 200K-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 3
GLM-4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.7
2.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Z.ai
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-10-15
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 1 only Claude Haiku 4.5 · 1 only GLM-4.7| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% ↗epoch | 83.3% ↗epoch | -12.1 pt | GLM-4.7 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 66.7% ↗epoch | 83.3% ↗epoch | -16.6 pt | GLM-4.7 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% ↗epoch | 32.2% ↗epoch | -19 pt | GLM-4.7 |
| Only Claude Haiku 4.5 reports · 1 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GLM-4.7 reports · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1435.9 ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Haiku 4.5 minus GLM-4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GLM-4.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 200K tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 131K tokens | GLM-4.7 |
| Input price / 1M | $1 ↗ | $0.6 ↗ | GLM-4.7 |
| Output price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $2.2 ↗ | GLM-4.7 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | $0.11 ↗ | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $6 | $2.8 | GLM-4.7 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2025-12-22 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 4 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GLM-4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.