ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Claude Haiku 4.5vsQwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5 27B leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5 27B is 7.8x cheaper per token. Qwen3.5 27B has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
Qwen3.5 27B leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.5 27B
7.8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.5 27B
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Qwen
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-10-15
textvision
Context
200K
Max out
64K
Input /1M
$1
Output /1M
$5
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
4 · 4 core
textvision
Context
262K
Max out
Input /1M
$0.086
Output /1M
$0.688
Cached /1M
Scores
5 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.5 27BΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
SWE-bench Verified73.3% 75% -1.7 ptQwen3.5 27B
GPQA Diamond71.2% epoch85.5% -14.3 ptQwen3.5 27B
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 reports · 2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)66.7% epochnot reported
SimpleQA Verified13.2% epochnot reported
Only Qwen3.5 27B reports · 3
MMLU-Pronot reported86.1%
AIME 2026not reported91.7% matharena
LMArena Elonot reported1408.1
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Haiku 4.5 minus Qwen3.5 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.5 27BEdge
Context window200K tokens262K tokensQwen3.5 27B
Max output64K tokens
Input price / 1M$1 $0.086 Qwen3.5 27B
Output price / 1M$5 $0.688 Qwen3.5 27B
Cached input / 1M$0.1
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$6$0.774Qwen3.5 27B
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2025-10-15
Cited benchmark scores45
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.5 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.