Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.7vs
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Claude Opus 4.7 leads 9 of 12 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro Preview is 2.1x cheaper per token. Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
9 – 3
Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
2.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Google
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Google · released 2025-11-18
textvisionaudiovideo
Quality
Benchmark matrix
12 shared · 26 only Claude Opus 4.7 · 12 only Gemini 3 Pro Preview| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 12 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 87.6% ↗ | 76.2% ↗ | +11.4 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.2% ↗ | 91.9% ↗ | +2.3 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 46.9% ↗ | 37.5% ↗ | +9.4 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 30% ↗epoch run | 31% ↗epoch run | -1 pt | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| GSO Opt@1 (GSO) | 42.2% ↗ | 17.7% ↗ | +24.5 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 97.8% ↗epoch run | 91.4% ↗epoch run | +6.4 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 56.1% ↗ | 47.6% ↗ | +8.5 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| SimpleBench (SimpleBench) | 61.7% ↗ | 76.4% ↗ | -14.7 pt | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% ↗epoch run | 72.1% ↗ | -20.4 pt | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 83.5% ↗epoch run | 72.9% ↗epoch run | +10.6 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 10936.76 ↗ | 5478.16 ↗ | +5458.6 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle) | 76.4% ↗ | 69.9% ↗ | +6.5 pt | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Only Claude Opus 4.7 reports · 26 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1483.4 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 49.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp | 79.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| EBR-bench (Epoch AI run) | 19% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 70.2% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run) | 33.3% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 50.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 82.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 78.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 66.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 77.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 92.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 87.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Vision (LMArena) | 1298.1 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1557.3 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MirrorCode (Epoch AI run) | 31.1% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 28% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 82.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 80.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | 34.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 64.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra) | 40.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 66.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 3 Pro Preview reports · 12 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 95% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 (with code execution) | not reported | 100% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (ARC Prize Verified) | not reported | 31.1% ↗ | — | — |
| BALROG (BALROG) | not reported | 58.1% ↗ | — | — |
| CharXiv Reasoning | not reported | 81.4% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with search and code execution) | not reported | 45.8% ↗ | — | — |
| MathArena Apex | not reported | 23.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMLU | not reported | 91.8% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | not reported | 81% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2 agent) | not reported | 54.2% ↗ | — | — |
| Video-MMMU | not reported | 87.6% ↗ | — | — |
| τ2-bench | not reported | 85.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.7 minus Gemini 3 Pro Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 66K tokens | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | $2 ↗ | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Output price / 1M | $25 ↗ | $12 ↗ | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $30 | $14 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio · video | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-11-18 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 46 | 25 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3 Pro Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.