Compare / head-to-head

Claude Opus 5vsStep 5 Preview

Claude Opus 5 leads 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Step 5 Preview is 8.1x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
5 – 0
Claude Opus 5 leads
Cheaper per token
Step 5 Preview
8.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · StepFun
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · released 2026-07-24
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$5 ↗
Output /1M
$25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
41 · 10 core
Step 5 Preview
StepFun · released 2026-09-20
textvisionvideo
Context
1M
Max out
64K
Input /1M
$1 ↗
Output /1M
$2.7 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
5 · 4 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Step 5 PreviewΔEdge
Reported by both · 5
LMArena Elo1489.7 ↗1453.7 ↗+36Claude Opus 5
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0867 ↗0.0048 ↗+0.1Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1289 ↗1259.7 ↗+29.3Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1695 ↗1570.2 ↗+124.8Claude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)53.5% ↗31.8% ↗+21.7 ptClaude Opus 5
Only Claude Opus 5 reports · 31
GPQA Diamond93.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)56.6% ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)65.8% ↗not reported——
BALROG (BALROG)63.4% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)42% ↗epoch runnot reported——
CursorBench 3.2.070% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)73.6% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)45.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)73.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)85.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)52% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)60.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPval-AA v21824 ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)65.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)81.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)74.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)63.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)88.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)95.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)91.2% ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)59% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)83.4% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)49.4% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)80.6% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified59.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SWE-rebench 2026-05-15 to 2026-07-01 (Nebius)63.4% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)48.7% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench Science 0.129% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)11181.87 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)91.8% ↗not reported——
Only Step 5 Preview reports · 0
Step 5 Preview reports nothing Claude Opus 5 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 5 minus Step 5 Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Opus 5Step 5 PreviewEdge
Context window1M tokens1M tokensTie
Max output128K tokens64K tokensClaude Opus 5
Input price / 1M$5 ↗$1 ↗Step 5 Preview
Output price / 1M$25 ↗$2.7 ↗Step 5 Preview
Cached input / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.05 ↗Step 5 Preview
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$30$3.7Step 5 Preview
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoStep 5 Preview
Released2026-07-242026-09-20—
Cited benchmark scores415—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Opus 5 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 5 and Step 5 Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.