ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 10.3x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 4
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
10.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Anthropic · Google
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-09-29
textvision
Context
200K
Max out
64K
Input /1M
$3
Output /1M
$15
Cached /1M
$0.3
Scores
21 · 10 core
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google · released 2026-03-03
textvisionaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.25
Output /1M
$1.5
Cached /1M
$0.025
Scores
10 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteΔEdge
Reported by both · 6
GPQA Diamond83.4% 86.9% -3.5 ptGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)17.7% 16% +1.7 ptClaude Sonnet 4.5
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)23.9% epoch27.7% epoch-3.8 ptGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
MMMLU89.5% 88.9% +0.6 ptClaude Sonnet 4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)77.8% epoch80% epoch-2.2 ptGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
SimpleQA Verified30.7% epoch43.3% -12.6 ptGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 reports · 14
SWE-bench Verified77.2% not reported
AIME 202584.2% matharenanot reported
ARC-AGI-2 (Verified)13.6% not reported
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)2.4% epochnot reported
GDPval-AA1276 not reported
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)33.6% not reported
MCP Atlas43.8% not reported
MMMU-Pro (no tools)63.4% not reported
MMMU-Pro (with tools)68.9% not reported
OSWorld-Verified61.4% not reported
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)71.3% epochnot reported
Tau2-bench Retail86.2% not reported
Tau2-bench Telecom98% not reported
Terminal-Bench 2.051% not reported
Only Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite reports · 3
LiveCodeBenchnot reported72%
MMMU-Pronot reported76.8%
MRCR v2 (128k average)not reported60.1%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 4.5 minus Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteEdge
Context window200K tokens1.0M tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Max output64K tokens66K tokensGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input price / 1M$3 $0.25 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Output price / 1M$15 $1.5 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Cached input / 1M$0.3 $0.025 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$18$1.75Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · audioGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Released2025-09-292026-03-03
Cited benchmark scores2110
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs …

More matchups

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.