Compare / head-to-head
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-4o
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 6 of 6 shared benchmarks. GPT-4o is 1.4x cheaper per token. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
6 – 0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-4o
1.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Claude Sonnet 4.5
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 95.2663%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · released 2025-09-29
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
6 shared · 14 only Claude Sonnet 4.5 · 2 only GPT-4o| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-4o | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 6 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 83.4% ↗ | 46% ↗ | +37.4 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| AIME 2025 | 84.2% ↗matharena ⚠ | 11.7% ↗matharena | +72.5 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 23.9% ↗epoch | 0.4% ↗epoch | +23.5 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 77.8% ↗epoch | 6.4% ↗epoch | +71.4 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% ↗epoch | 26% ↗epoch | +4.7 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 71.3% ↗epoch | 31% ↗epoch | +40.3 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 reports · 14 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 17.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 13.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 2.4% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1276 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 33.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | 43.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMLU | 89.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | 63.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 68.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 61.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Retail | 86.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | 98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 51% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-4o reports · 2 | ||||
| MMLU | not reported | 85.7% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 13.1% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 4.5 minus GPT-4o in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-4o | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 16K tokens | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Input price / 1M | $3 ↗ | $2.5 ↗ | GPT-4o |
| Output price / 1M | $15 ↗ | $10 ↗ | GPT-4o |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.3 ↗ | $1.25 ↗ | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $18 | $12.5 | GPT-4o |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2024-05-13 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 21 | 9 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-4o vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-4o on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.