Compare / head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 5.5vsGLM-5V-Turbo

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Claude Sonnet 5.5
1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Anthropic · Z.ai
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic · released 2026-09-28
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
29 · 10 core
GLM-5V-Turbo
Z.ai · released 2026-04-02
textvisionvideo
Context
200K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5V-TurboΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
LMArena Elo1471 ↗1433.5 ↗+37.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1268.3 ↗1230.1 ↗+38.2Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1786.3 ↗1399.8 ↗+386.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 reports · 26
GPQA Diamond95.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)75.5% ↗not reported——
Chartography (no tools)61.6% ↗not reported——
CursorBench 4.055.5% ↗not reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)46.2% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)80.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)88.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)61.9% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)75% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)64.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)91.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)70.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)83.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)91.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1252 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)65% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld 2.1 (partial)80.1% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)51.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)75.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified46.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.070.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)64.1% ↗not reported——
Only GLM-5V-Turbo reports · 15
AndroidWorldnot reported75.7% ↗——
BrowseComp-VLnot reported51.9% ↗——
CC-Backendnot reported22.8% ↗——
CC-Frontendnot reported68.4% ↗——
CC-Repo-Explorationnot reported72.2% ↗——
Design2Codenot reported94.8% ↗——
Flame-VLM-Codenot reported93.8% ↗——
ImageMiningnot reported30.7% ↗——
MMSearchnot reported72.9% ↗——
MMSearch-Plusnot reported30% ↗——
OSWorldnot reported62.3% ↗——
SimpleVQAnot reported78.2% ↗——
V*not reported89% ↗——
Vision2Webnot reported31% ↗——
WebVoyagernot reported88.5% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 5.5 minus GLM-5V-Turbo in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5V-TurboEdge
Context window1M tokens200K tokensClaude Sonnet 5.5
Max output128K tokens128K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$2 ↗——
Output price / 1M$10 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.2 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12——
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoGLM-5V-Turbo
Released2026-09-282026-04-02—
Cited benchmark scores2918—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs …

More matchups

GLM-5V-Turbo vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5V-Turbo on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.