Compare / head-to-head
Command R7BvsPhi-4
Phi-4 leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Command R7B has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 2
Phi-4 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Command R7B
128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Microsoft
Command R7B
Cohere · released 2024-12-16
text
Phi-4
Microsoft · released 2024-12-12
text
- Context
- 16K
- Max out
- 16K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 11 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 4 only Command R7B · 7 only Phi-4| Benchmark | Command R7B | Phi-4 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| MMLU | 65.2% ↗ | 84.8% ↗ | -19.6 pt | Phi-4 |
| MMLU-Pro | 42.4% ↗ | 70.4% ↗ | -28 pt | Phi-4 |
| IFEval | 77.9% ↗ | 63% ↗ | +14.9 pt | Command R7B |
| Only Command R7B reports · 4 | ||||
| BFCL Overall | 52.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GPQA | 26.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 72% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| RepoQA | 69.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 reports · 7 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 56.1% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval | not reported | 82.6% ↗ | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1216.6 ↗ | — | — |
| ArenaHard | not reported | 75.4% ↗ | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | not reported | 82.8% ↗ | — | — |
| MATH | not reported | 80.4% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 13.8% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R7B minus Phi-4 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R7B | Phi-4 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 16K tokens | Command R7B |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 16K tokens | Phi-4 |
| Input price / 1M | $0.038 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $0.15 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0.188 | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2024-12-16 | 2024-12-12 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 11 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R7B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R7B and Phi-4 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.