Compare / head-to-head
DeepSeek R1vsPhi-4 Reasoning
DeepSeek R1 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
DeepSeek R1 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
DeepSeek R1
128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
DeepSeek · Microsoft
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek · released 2025-01-20
text
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 33K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 8 · 7 core
Phi-4 Reasoning
Microsoft · released 2025-04-30
text
- Context
- 33K
- Max out
- 33K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 4 · 4 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 4 only DeepSeek R1 · 1 only Phi-4 Reasoning| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | Phi-4 Reasoning | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 71.5% ↗ | 65.8% ↗ | +5.7 pt | DeepSeek R1 |
| MMLU-Pro | 84% ↗ | 74.3% ↗ | +9.7 pt | DeepSeek R1 |
| AIME 2025 | 70% ↗matharena | 62.9% ↗ | +7.1 pt | DeepSeek R1 |
| Only DeepSeek R1 reports · 4 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 49.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU | 90.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1372.6 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 53.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 Reasoning reports · 1 | ||||
| HumanEval+ | not reported | 92.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek R1 minus Phi-4 Reasoning in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | DeepSeek R1 | Phi-4 Reasoning | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 33K tokens | DeepSeek R1 |
| Max output | 33K tokens | 33K tokens | Tie |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2025-04-30 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
DeepSeek R1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 Reasoning vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek R1 and Phi-4 Reasoning on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.