Compare / head-to-head

DeepSeek V3.1vsGPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
GPT-6 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
DeepSeek · OpenAI
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek · released 2025-08-21
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 9 core
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
27 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1GPT-6 SolΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
LMArena Elo1417.1 ↗1457.2 ↗-40.1GPT-6 Sol
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)40% ↗73.1% ↗-33.1 ptGPT-6 Sol
Only DeepSeek V3.1 reports · 16
Aider-Polyglot (thinking)76.3% ↗not reported——
AIME 2024 (thinking)93.1% ↗not reported——
AIME 2025 (thinking)88.4% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp30% ↗not reported——
GPQA-Diamond (thinking)80.1% ↗not reported——
HMMT 2025 (thinking)84.2% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (Python + Search)29.8% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (thinking, text-only)15.9% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (2408-2505) (thinking)74.8% ↗not reported——
MMLU-Pro (thinking)84.8% ↗not reported——
MMLU-Redux (thinking)93.7% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA (search agent)93.4% ↗not reported——
SWE Verified (Agent mode)66% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Multilingual (Agent mode)54.5% ↗not reported——
Terminal-bench (Terminus 1 framework)31.3% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)38.4% ↗not reported——
Only GPT-6 Sol reports · 25
GPQA Diamondnot reported94.3% ↗epoch run——
Agents' Last Exam V1not reported56.4% ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported54.3% ↗——
AutomationBench 1.0.6not reported33.2% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported68.8% ↗——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported53.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported90% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported89.8% ↗epoch run——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported58.3% ↗epoch run——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported52.9% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported81.2% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported68.6% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported85.3% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported96.4% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported88.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.0971 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1689 ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported56% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (offline, partial)not reported60.5% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported44.8% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported60.7% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported44.4% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported14427.85 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.1 minus GPT-6 Sol in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDeepSeek V3.1GPT-6 SolEdge
Context window128K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Sol
Max output—128K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$2 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$10 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.2 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$12—
Modalitiestexttext · visionGPT-6 Sol
Released2025-08-212026-09-22—
Cited benchmark scores1827—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Sol vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.1 and GPT-6 Sol on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.