Compare / head-to-head

DeepSeek V3.2-ExpvsGemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 2.5 Pro
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
DeepSeek · Google
DeepSeek V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek · released 2025-09-29
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · released 2025-06-17
textvisionaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.125
Scores
28 · 11 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2-ExpGemini 2.5 ProΔEdge
Reported by both · 7
AIME 202589.3% ↗88% ↗+1.3 ptDeepSeek V3.2-Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)19.8% ↗21.6% ↗-1.8 ptGemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Elo1424.9 ↗1457.8 ↗-32.9Gemini 2.5 Pro
LiveCodeBench74.1% ↗74.2% ↗-0.1 ptGemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1271.8 ↗1227 ↗+44.8DeepSeek V3.2-Exp
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)1034 ↗573.64 ↗+460.4DeepSeek V3.2-Exp
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)39.5% ↗54% ↗-14.5 ptGemini 2.5 Pro
Only DeepSeek V3.2-Exp reports · 10
MMLU-Pro85% ↗not reported——
Aider-Polyglot74.5% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp40.1% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp-zh47.9% ↗not reported——
GPQA-Diamond79.9% ↗not reported——
HMMT 202583.6% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA (agentic tool use)97.1% ↗not reported——
SWE Verified67.8% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Multilingual57.9% ↗not reported——
Terminal-bench37.7% ↗not reported——
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro reports · 13
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported59.6% ↗——
GPQA Diamondnot reported86.4% ↗——
Aider Polyglotnot reported82.2% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported20% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported0% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported24.6% ↗epoch run——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)not reported0% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1247.5 ↗——
MMMUnot reported82% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported84.7% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported41.9% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported57.6% ↗epoch run——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported13.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.2-Exp minus Gemini 2.5 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDeepSeek V3.2-ExpGemini 2.5 ProEdge
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokensGemini 2.5 Pro
Max output—66K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$10 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.125 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$11.25—
Modalitiestexttext · vision · audioGemini 2.5 Pro
Released2025-09-292025-06-17—
Cited benchmark scores1728—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

DeepSeek V3.2-Exp vs …

More matchups

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.2-Exp and Gemini 2.5 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.