Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.0vsLlama 4 Maverick
ERNIE 5.0 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
ERNIE 5.0 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Llama 4 Maverick
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Meta
ERNIE 5.0
Baidu · released 2026-02-06
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 21 · 5 core
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · released 2025-04-05
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 19 only ERNIE 5.0 · 0 only Llama 4 Maverick| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 | Llama 4 Maverick | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 86.36% ↗ | 69.8% ↗ | +16.6 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.8% ↗ | 80.5% ↗ | +3.3 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| Only ERNIE 5.0 reports · 19 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | 89.06% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench Chinese | 89.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench English | 87.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BBEH | 66.63% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL v4 | 66.47% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 64.71% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ChineseSimpleQA | 86.03% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HMMT 2025 | 79.58% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | 94.48% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 93.35% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 76.21% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 82.54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Multi-IF | 85.56% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MultiChallenge | 65.98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA | 74.01% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SpreadsheetBench | 40.08% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench | 78.79% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZebraLogic | 96.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 4 Maverick reports · 0 | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick reports nothing ERNIE 5.0 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.0 minus Llama 4 Maverick in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.0 | Llama 4 Maverick | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-02-06 | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 21 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 4 Maverick vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.0 and Llama 4 Maverick on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.