Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsMuse Spark 1.1

Gemini 4 Argon leads 7 of 7 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is 2.2x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
7 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Muse Spark 1.1
2.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Meta
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta · released 2026-07-09
textvisionvideoaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
30 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark 1.1ΔEdge
Reported by both · 7
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1491.3 ↗+33.9Gemini 4 Argon
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗31.8% ↗+50.4 ptGemini 4 Argon
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗53.3% ↗+24.6 ptGemini 4 Argon
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗-0.0488 ↗+0.1Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗1541.7 ↗+137.8Gemini 4 Argon
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗45.6% ↗+8 ptGemini 4 Argon
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗6520.48 ↗+7197.7Gemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 5
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.1 reports · 23
BabyVisionnot reported76.3% ↗——
CharXiv Reasoningnot reported88.4% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported53.3% ↗——
Finance Agent v2not reported57.2% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not reported62.1% ↗——
JobBenchnot reported54.7% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported58.5% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported77.2% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported72.5% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported69.6% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported74.3% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported87.1% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported87.7% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1281.1 ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported88.1% ↗——
OSWorld-Verifiednot reported80.8% ↗——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)not reported80.7% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported57.8% ↗epoch run——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported61.5% ↗——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported40.5% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported80% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verifiednot reported75.6% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported75.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Muse Spark 1.1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark 1.1Edge
Context window—1.0M tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$1.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.1
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$4.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.1
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.15 ↗Gemini 4 Argon
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$5.5Muse Spark 1.1
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · video · audioMuse Spark 1.1
Released2026-09-302026-07-09—
Cited benchmark scores1230—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.