Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking

Gemini 4 Argon leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking is 8.9x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
8.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Qwen
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
Qwen · released 2025-09-11
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.15 ↗
Output /1M
$1.2 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
16 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-Next 80B-A3B ThinkingΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1369.4 ↗+155.8Gemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 11
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking reports · 15
MMLU-Pronot reported82.7% ↗——
AIME25not reported87.8% ↗——
Arena-Hard v2not reported62.3% ↗——
BFCL-v3not reported72% ↗——
GPQAnot reported77.2% ↗——
HMMT25not reported73.9% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported88.9% ↗——
LiveBench 241125not reported76.6% ↗——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)not reported68.7% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported92.5% ↗——
OJBenchnot reported29.7% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported60.8% ↗——
TAU2-Airlinenot reported60.5% ↗——
TAU2-Retailnot reported67.8% ↗——
TAU2-Telecomnot reported43.9% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-Next 80B-A3B ThinkingEdge
Context window—262K tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.15 ↗Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$1.2 ↗Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$1.35Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
Modalitiestext · vision · videotextGemini 4 Argon
Released2026-09-302025-09-11—
Cited benchmark scores1216—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.