Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking

Gemini 4 Argon leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
2.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Qwen
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Qwen · released 2025-09-23
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.4 ↗
Output /1M
$4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1395 ↗+130.2Gemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 11
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking reports · 16
MMLU-Pronot reported83.8% ↗——
AIME25not reported89.7% ↗——
BFCLnot reported71.9% ↗——
HLEnot reported13.6% ↗——
HMMT25not reported77.4% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported88.2% ↗——
LCB v6not reported70.1% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1188 ↗——
MathVista (mini)not reported85.8% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported93.7% ↗——
MMMU (val)not reported80.6% ↗——
MMMU_Pronot reported69.3% ↗——
OSWorldnot reported38.1% ↗——
SimpleQAnot reported44.4% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported64.3% ↗——
VideoMME (w/o sub)not reported79% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingEdge
Context window—256K tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.4 ↗Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$4 ↗Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$4.4Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · videoTie
Released2026-09-302025-09-23—
Cited benchmark scores1217—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.