Compare / head-to-head
GLM-5.2vsGPT-4.1 mini
GLM-5.2 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. GPT-4.1 mini is 2.9x cheaper per token. GPT-4.1 mini has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
GLM-5.2 leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-4.1 mini
2.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-4.1 mini
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 95.2096%
Z.ai · OpenAI
GLM-5.2
Z.ai · released 2026-06-24
text
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI · released 2025-04-14
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 21 only GLM-5.2 · 2 only GPT-4.1 mini| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | GPT-4.1 mini | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 91.9% ↗epoch | 65% ↗ | +26.9 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 59.2% ↗epoch | 6.7% ↗epoch | +52.5 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 86.4% ↗epoch | 44.7% ↗epoch | +41.7 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.2% ↗epoch | 12.7% ↗epoch | +21.5 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| Only GLM-5.2 reports · 21 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 90% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI) | 23.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AutomationBench v1.0.6 | 26.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CyberGym | 77.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 46.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitBench | 24.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 2h | 29 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 6h | 39 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 29.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierSWE | 67.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1508 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HLE (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| NL2Repo | 48.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| PostTrainBench | 31.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ProgramBench (Almost Solved) | 9.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 62.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 78.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Marathon v1.1 | 19.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 4.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon Verified | 59.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-4.1 mini reports · 2 | ||||
| MMLU | not reported | 87.5% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 49.6% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.2 minus GPT-4.1 mini in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-5.2 | GPT-4.1 mini | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.0M tokens | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 33K tokens | GLM-5.2 |
| Input price / 1M | $1.4 ↗ | $0.4 ↗ | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Output price / 1M | $4.4 ↗ | $1.6 ↗ | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.26 ↗ | $0.1 ↗ | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $5.8 | $2 | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Released | 2026-06-24 | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 26 | 7 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-5.2 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-4.1 mini vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.2 and GPT-4.1 mini on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.