ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-5.2vsSeed2.1 Pro

GLM-5.2 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-5.2 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · ByteDance Seed
GLM-5.2
Z.ai · released 2026-06-24
text
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$1.4
Output /1M
$4.4
Cached /1M
$0.26
Scores
26 · 9 core
Seed2.1 Pro
ByteDance Seed · released 2026-07-13
textvisionvideo
Context
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
26 · 2 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-5.2Seed2.1 ProΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Terminal-Bench 2.181% 71% +10 ptGLM-5.2
Only GLM-5.2 reports · 24
GPQA Diamond91.9% epochnot reported
AIME 202690% matharenanot reported
Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI)23.8% not reported
AutomationBench v1.0.626.2% not reported
CyberGym77.2% not reported
DeepSWE v1.146.2% not reported
ExploitBench24.4% not reported
ExploitGym 2h29 not reported
ExploitGym 6h39 not reported
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)29.3% epochnot reported
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)59.2% epochnot reported
FrontierSWE67.5% not reported
GDPval-AA v21508 not reported
HLE (with tools)54.7% not reported
NL2Repo48.9% not reported
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)86.4% epochnot reported
PostTrainBench31.7% not reported
ProgramBench (Almost Solved)9.5% not reported
SimpleQA Verified34.2% epochnot reported
SWE-Bench Pro62.1% not reported
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)78.7% epochnot reported
SWE-Marathon v1.119.4% not reported
Terminal-Bench 3.04.6% not reported
Toolathlon Verified59.9% not reported
Only Seed2.1 Pro reports · 25
Agent Startup Benchnot reported68.8%
BabyVisionnot reported73.7%
BeyondAIMEnot reported87%
CharXiv-RQnot reported85.4%
CharXiv-RQ (with tools)not reported86.4%
ERQAnot reported72%
KINAnot reported48.3%
MathVisionnot reported92.6%
MathVision (with tools)not reported94.5%
Minerva Video Reasoningnot reported70.7%
MMLongBench 128Knot reported78.3%
MMMU-Pronot reported81.6%
MMMU-Pro (with tools)not reported82.7%
NL2Repo-Benchnot reported47%
OVOBenchnot reported80.7%
SuperGPQAnot reported70.8%
SWE-Atlasnot reported35.2%
TOMATOnot reported79.5%
VideoMMEnot reported89.2%
VideoSimpleQAnot reported76.4%
Workspace Benchnot reported53%
WorldVQAnot reported53%
xDailyBenchnot reported61%
ZEROBenchnot reported18%
ZEROBench (with tools)not reported22%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.2 minus Seed2.1 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-5.2Seed2.1 ProEdge
Context window1M tokens
Max output131K tokens
Input price / 1M$1.4
Output price / 1M$4.4
Cached input / 1M$0.26
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$5.8
Modalitiestexttext · vision · videoSeed2.1 Pro
Released2026-06-242026-07-13
Cited benchmark scores2626
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

GLM-5.2 vs …

More matchups

Seed2.1 Pro vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.2 and Seed2.1 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.