Compare / head-to-head

GLM-5.3-FlashXvsGPT-6 Astra

GLM-5.3-FlashX and GPT-6 Astra do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GLM-5.3-FlashX is 37x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Astra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
GLM-5.3-FlashX
37x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Astra
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Z.ai · OpenAI
textvisionvideo
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.37 ↗
Output /1M
$1.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.075
Scores
0 · 0 core
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · released 2026-09-03
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
39 · 9 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashXGPT-6 AstraΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only GLM-5.3-FlashX reports · 0
GLM-5.3-FlashX reports nothing GPT-6 Astra does not.
Only GPT-6 Astra reports · 33
GPQA Diamondnot reported96% ↗——
LMArena Elonot reported1477.1 ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported64.7% ↗——
AutomationBench 1.0.6not reported41.4% ↗——
BALROG (BALROG)not reported68.3% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported72% ↗epoch run——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported74.1% ↗——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported76.2% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported97.6% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported93.7% ↗epoch run——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported65.5% ↗——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported80% ↗epoch run——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)not reported77.5% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported57.3% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported80.4% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported83% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported75.6% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported89.4% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported96.8% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported92.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.1227 ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1284.3 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1787.7 ↗——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)not reported46.7% ↗epoch run——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported84% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported46.4% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported86.5% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported75.6% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported59.6% ↗——
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1not reported64.6% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported15514.7 ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported93.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.3-FlashX minus GPT-6 Astra in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-5.3-FlashXGPT-6 AstraEdge
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Astra
Max output131K tokens128K tokensGLM-5.3-FlashX
Input price / 1M$0.37 ↗$10 ↗GLM-5.3-FlashX
Output price / 1M$1.25 ↗$50 ↗GLM-5.3-FlashX
Cached input / 1M$0.075 ↗$1 ↗GLM-5.3-FlashX
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.62$60GLM-5.3-FlashX
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · visionGLM-5.3-FlashX
Released—2026-09-03—
Cited benchmark scores039—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.3-FlashX and GPT-6 Astra on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.