Compare / head-to-head

GPT-5.1-Codex MinivsHy3

Hy3 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Hy3 is 3.4x cheaper per token. GPT-5.1-Codex Mini has the larger context window (400K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Hy3 leads
Cheaper per token
Hy3
3.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
400K tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Tencent Hunyuan
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
OpenAI · released 2025-11-13
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.25 ↗
Output /1M
$2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.025
Scores
1 · 1 core
Hy3
Tencent Hunyuan · released 2026-07-06
text
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.132 ↗
Output /1M
$0.528 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.033
Scores
45 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex MiniHy3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1243.6 ↗1507.4 ↗-263.8Hy3
Only GPT-5.1-Codex Mini reports · 0
GPT-5.1-Codex Mini reports nothing Hy3 does not.
Only Hy3 reports · 43
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported78% ↗——
GPQA Diamondnot reported90.4% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)not reported37% ↗——
LMArena Elonot reported1440.6 ↗——
AA-LCRnot reported73.4% ↗——
Apex-Agentnot reported25.6% ↗——
ArxivMathnot reported52.2% ↗——
BrowseCompnot reported84.2% ↗——
CL-benchnot reported23.8% ↗——
CL-bench Lifenot reported17% ↗——
ClawEvalnot reported68.5% ↗——
CMT-Benchmarknot reported37.8% ↗——
DeepSearchQAnot reported91% ↗——
DeepSWEnot reported28% ↗——
e-benchnot reported50.2% ↗——
FrontierScience-Olympiadnot reported74.8% ↗——
FrontierScience-Researchnot reported21.3% ↗——
HLE (with tools, text-only)not reported53.2% ↗——
HorizonMathnot reported7.1% ↗——
Hy-Backend 2.0not reported25% ↗——
Hy-CompanyBenchnot reported41.7% ↗——
Hy-Euler Pronot reported24.2% ↗——
Hy-FinModelBenchnot reported69% ↗——
Hy-Mathnot reported60.9% ↗——
Hy-SkillsWorldnot reported45.8% ↗——
Hy-SWE Maxnot reported49% ↗——
IMOAnswerBenchnot reported90% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported-0.0538 ↗——
MathArena Apexnot reported38.7% ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported79.1% ↗——
NL2Reponot reported45.6% ↗——
PHYBenchnot reported77.4% ↗——
ProdBenchnot reported23% ↗——
SkillsBenchnot reported55.3% ↗——
SuperChemnot reported54.9% ↗——
SWE-bench Multilingualnot reported75.8% ↗——
SWE-bench Pronot reported57.9% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported71.7% ↗——
Toolathlonnot reported48.5% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported56.8% ↗——
USAMO 2026not reported72% ↗——
WideSearchnot reported76.4% ↗——
WildClawBenchnot reported53.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.1-Codex Mini minus Hy3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-5.1-Codex MiniHy3Edge
Context window400K tokens256K tokensGPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.25 ↗$0.132 ↗Hy3
Output price / 1M$2 ↗$0.528 ↗Hy3
Cached input / 1M$0.025 ↗$0.033 ↗GPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.25$0.66Hy3
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-5.1-Codex Mini
Released2025-11-132026-07-06—
Cited benchmark scores145—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-5.1-Codex Mini vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.1-Codex Mini and Hy3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.