Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5.6 TerravsQwen3.7-Flash
GPT-5.6 Terra leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Flash is 101.4x cheaper per token. GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GPT-5.6 Terra leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.7-Flash
101.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.6 Terra
1.1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
95.493% · —
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI · released 2026-07-09
textvision
Qwen3.7-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-07-15
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 4 only GPT-5.6 Terra · 0 only Qwen3.7-Flash| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Terra | Qwen3.7-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 92.9% ↗ | 82.3% ↗epoch | +10.6 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 86% ↗epoch | 19.3% ↗epoch | +66.7 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 99.7% ↗epoch | 86.7% ↗epoch | +13 pt | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Only GPT-5.6 Terra reports · 4 | ||||
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 69.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 70.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 43.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 63.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.7-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.7-Flash reports nothing GPT-5.6 Terra does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.6 Terra minus Qwen3.7-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5.6 Terra | Qwen3.7-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 1M tokens | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | $0.028 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $12 ↗ | $0.11 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $14 | $0.138 | Qwen3.7-Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | 2026-07-15 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 3 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-5.6 Terra vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.7-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.7-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.