Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6.1 SolvsMiniMax M2

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. MiniMax M2 is 8x cheaper per token. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
MiniMax M2
8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · MiniMax
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
MiniMax M2
MiniMax · released 2025-10-27
text
Context
205K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.3 ↗
Output /1M
$1.2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.03
Scores
17 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolMiniMax M2ΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
LMArena Elo1483.2 ↗1343.4 ↗+139.8GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1757.8 ↗1296.6 ↗+461.2GPT-6.1 Sol
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.9% ↗25% ↗+57.9 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 21
GPQA Diamond95.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)60% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch runnot reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)54.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1123 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.6 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified73.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)55.1% ↗not reported——
Only MiniMax M2 reports · 14
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported69.4% ↗——
AgentCompanynot reported36% ↗——
ArtifactsBenchnot reported66.8% ↗——
BrowseCompnot reported44% ↗——
BrowseComp-zhnot reported48.5% ↗——
FinSearchComp-globalnot reported65.5% ↗——
GAIA (text only)not reported75.7% ↗——
HLE (w/ tools)not reported31.8% ↗——
Multi-SWE-Benchnot reported36.2% ↗——
SWE-bench Multilingualnot reported56.5% ↗——
Terminal-Benchnot reported46.3% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported160.6 ↗——
xbench-DeepSearchnot reported72% ↗——
τ²-Benchnot reported77.2% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6.1 Sol minus MiniMax M2 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6.1 SolMiniMax M2Edge
Context window1.1M tokens205K tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output128K tokens128K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.3 ↗MiniMax M2
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$1.2 ↗MiniMax M2
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.03 ↗MiniMax M2
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$1.5MiniMax M2
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6.1 Sol
Released2026-09-292025-10-27—
Cited benchmark scores2417—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

MiniMax M2 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6.1 Sol and MiniMax M2 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.