Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6.1 SolvsQwen3.5 2B

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
Qwen3.5 2B
Qwen · released 2026-03-02
textvisionvideo
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
16 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.5 2BΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch run0% ↗epoch run+61 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 23
GPQA Diamond95.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LMArena Elo1483.2 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)60% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)54.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1123 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.6 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1757.8 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified73.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)55.1% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3.5 2B reports · 15
BFCL-V4 (thinking)not reported43.6% ↗——
GPQA (thinking)not reported51.6% ↗——
HMMT Feb 25 (thinking)not reported22.9% ↗——
IFBench (thinking)not reported41.3% ↗——
IFEval (non-thinking)not reported61.2% ↗——
IFEval (thinking)not reported78.6% ↗——
LongBench v2 (thinking)not reported38.7% ↗——
MMLU-Pro (non-thinking)not reported55.3% ↗——
MMLU-Pro (thinking)not reported66.5% ↗——
MMLU-Redux (thinking)not reported79.6% ↗——
MMMLU (thinking)not reported63.1% ↗——
MMMU (thinking)not reported64.2% ↗——
MMMU-Pro (thinking)not reported50.3% ↗——
SuperGPQA (thinking)not reported37.5% ↗——
TAU2-Bench (thinking)not reported48.8% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6.1 Sol minus Qwen3.5 2B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.5 2BEdge
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗——
Output price / 1M$10 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12——
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoQwen3.5 2B
Released2026-09-292026-03-02—
Cited benchmark scores2416—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Qwen3.5 2B vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.5 2B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.