Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6.1 SolvsQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking is 2.7x cheaper per token. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
2.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Qwen · released 2025-09-23
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.4 ↗
Output /1M
$4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
LMArena Elo1483.2 ↗1395 ↗+88.2GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.6 ↗1188 ↗+102.6GPT-6.1 Sol
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 22
GPQA Diamond95.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)60% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch runnot reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)54.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1123 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1757.8 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified73.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)55.1% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking reports · 15
MMLU-Pronot reported83.8% ↗——
AIME25not reported89.7% ↗——
BFCLnot reported71.9% ↗——
HLEnot reported13.6% ↗——
HMMT25not reported77.4% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported88.2% ↗——
LCB v6not reported70.1% ↗——
MathVista (mini)not reported85.8% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported93.7% ↗——
MMMU (val)not reported80.6% ↗——
MMMU_Pronot reported69.3% ↗——
OSWorldnot reported38.1% ↗——
SimpleQAnot reported44.4% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported64.3% ↗——
VideoMME (w/o sub)not reported79% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6.1 Sol minus Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingEdge
Context window1.1M tokens256K tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.4 ↗Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$4 ↗Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$4.4Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Released2026-09-292025-09-23—
Cited benchmark scores2417—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.