Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 AstravsMercury 2.5

GPT-6 Astra leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Mercury 2.5 is 63.2x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Astra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GPT-6 Astra leads
Cheaper per token
Mercury 2.5
63.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Astra
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Inception
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · released 2026-09-03
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
39 · 9 core
Mercury 2.5
Inception · released 2026-09-08
text
Context
260K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.02
Scores
1 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMercury 2.5ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)59.6% ↗0% ↗+59.6 ptGPT-6 Astra
Only GPT-6 Astra reports · 32
GPQA Diamond96% ↗not reported——
LMArena Elo1477.1 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)64.7% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.641.4% ↗not reported——
BALROG (BALROG)68.3% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)72% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)74.1% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)76.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)97.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)65.5% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)77.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)57.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)83% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)75.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)89.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1227 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1284.3 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1787.7 ↗not reported——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)46.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)84% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.4% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)86.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified75.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench Science 0.164.6% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)15514.7 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)93.6% ↗not reported——
Only Mercury 2.5 reports · 0
Mercury 2.5 reports nothing GPT-6 Astra does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Astra minus Mercury 2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 AstraMercury 2.5Edge
Context window1.1M tokens260K tokensGPT-6 Astra
Max output128K tokens66K tokensGPT-6 Astra
Input price / 1M$10 ↗$0.2 ↗Mercury 2.5
Output price / 1M$50 ↗$0.75 ↗Mercury 2.5
Cached input / 1M$1 ↗$0.02 ↗Mercury 2.5
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$60$0.95Mercury 2.5
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6 Astra
Released2026-09-032026-09-08—
Cited benchmark scores391—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Astra and Mercury 2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.