Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 AstravsMuse Spark

GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark split their 4 shared benchmarks evenly.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 2
even split
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
—
both 1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Meta
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI · released 2026-09-03
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$10 ↗
Output /1M
$50 ↗
Cached /1M
$1
Scores
39 · 9 core
Muse Spark
Meta · released 2026-04-08
textvision
Context
—
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
19 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMuse SparkΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
GPQA Diamond96% ↗89.5% ↗+6.5 ptGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Elo1477.1 ↗1489.3 ↗-12.2Muse Spark
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1284.3 ↗1293.6 ↗-9.3Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run88.9% ↗epoch run+11.1 ptGPT-6 Astra
Only GPT-6 Astra reports · 29
APEX-Agents (Mercor)64.7% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.641.4% ↗not reported——
BALROG (BALROG)68.3% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)72% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)74.1% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)76.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)97.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)65.5% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)77.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)57.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)83% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)75.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)89.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1227 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1787.7 ↗not reported——
MirrorCode (Epoch AI run)46.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)84% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.4% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)86.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified75.6% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)59.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench Science 0.164.6% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)15514.7 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)93.6% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark reports · 14
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported77.4% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)not reported42.8% ↗——
ARC AGI 2 (Public)not reported42.5% ↗——
CharXiv Reasoningnot reported86.4% ↗——
DeepSearchQAnot reported74.8% ↗——
HealthBench Hardnot reported42.8% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not reported50.4% ↗——
LiveCodeBench Pronot reported80% ↗——
MedXpertQA (MM)not reported78.4% ↗——
MMMU Pronot reported80.4% ↗——
ScreenSpot Pro (With Python)not reported84.1% ↗——
SimpleVQAnot reported71.3% ↗——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported52.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.0not reported59% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Astra minus Muse Spark in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 AstraMuse SparkEdge
Context window1.1M tokens——
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$10 ↗——
Output price / 1M$50 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$60——
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-09-032026-04-08—
Cited benchmark scores3919—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Astra and Muse Spark on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.