Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsGrok 4.7

Grok 4.7 leads 14 of 22 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is 13.3x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
7 – 14
Grok 4.7 leads · 1 tied
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
13.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · xAI
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Grok 4.7
xAI · released 2026-09-21
textvision
Context
500K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
30 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7ΔEdge
Reported by both · 22
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch run92.7% ↗epoch run-2.2 ptGrok 4.7
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗1442.5 ↗+0.4GPT-6 Luna
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗54.6% ↗-10.3 ptGrok 4.7
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch run38% ↗epoch run-7 ptGrok 4.7
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗71% ↗-4.4 ptGrok 4.7
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch run17.1% ↗epoch run+39 ptGPT-6 Luna
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch run53% ↗epoch run+25.9 ptGPT-6 Luna
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch run20.8% ↗epoch run+23.4 ptGPT-6 Luna
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗54% ↗-2.8 ptGrok 4.7
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗77.2% ↗+1.8 ptGPT-6 Luna
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗76.9% ↗-3.5 ptGrok 4.7
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗75.3% ↗-19.4 ptGrok 4.7
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗80.1% ↗-6.3 ptGrok 4.7
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗95.7% ↗-6.6 ptGrok 4.7
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗82.7% ↗-0.9 ptGrok 4.7
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗0.0404 ↗0Tie
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗1637.5 ↗-58.8Grok 4.7
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch run29% ↗epoch run-22 ptGrok 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch run98.1% ↗epoch run+0.8 ptGPT-6 Luna
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗40.8% ↗+7.3 ptGPT-6 Luna
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch run56% ↗epoch run-14.6 ptGrok 4.7
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗28.8% ↗-15.2 ptGrok 4.7
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 0
GPT-6 Luna reports nothing Grok 4.7 does not.
Only Grok 4.7 reports · 8
AA Briefcase v1.1not reported1657 ↗——
CursorBench 4.0not reported46.3% ↗——
EEBenchnot reported64% ↗——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported29.5% ↗——
Harvey Legal Agent Benchmarknot reported19.6% ↗——
HealthBench Professionalnot reported56.7% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0not reported38% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported10536.83 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Grok 4.7 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7Edge
Context window1.1M tokens500K tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$2 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$6 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗$0.5 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$8GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-09-222026-09-21—
Cited benchmark scores2230—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

More matchups

Grok 4.7 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.7 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.