Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 SolvsMuse Spark

GPT-6 Sol leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 1
GPT-6 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
—
both 1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Meta
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
27 · 8 core
Muse Spark
Meta · released 2026-04-08
textvision
Context
—
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
19 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMuse SparkΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
GPQA Diamond94.3% ↗epoch run89.5% ↗+4.8 ptGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Elo1457.2 ↗1489.3 ↗-32.1Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run88.9% ↗epoch run+11.1 ptGPT-6 Sol
Only GPT-6 Sol reports · 24
Agents' Last Exam V156.4% ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)54.3% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.633.2% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.168.8% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)53.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)90% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)89.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)58.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)52.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)81.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)68.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)85.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)88.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0971 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1689 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)56% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld 2.0 (offline, partial)60.5% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)73.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified60.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)44.4% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)14427.85 ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark reports · 15
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported77.4% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)not reported42.8% ↗——
ARC AGI 2 (Public)not reported42.5% ↗——
CharXiv Reasoningnot reported86.4% ↗——
DeepSearchQAnot reported74.8% ↗——
HealthBench Hardnot reported42.8% ↗——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not reported50.4% ↗——
LiveCodeBench Pronot reported80% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1293.6 ↗——
MedXpertQA (MM)not reported78.4% ↗——
MMMU Pronot reported80.4% ↗——
ScreenSpot Pro (With Python)not reported84.1% ↗——
SimpleVQAnot reported71.3% ↗——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported52.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.0not reported59% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Sol minus Muse Spark in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 SolMuse SparkEdge
Context window1.1M tokens——
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗——
Output price / 1M$10 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.2 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12——
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-09-222026-04-08—
Cited benchmark scores2719—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Sol vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Sol and Muse Spark on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.