Compare / head-to-head

Grok 4.6vsSolar Pro 4

Grok 4.6 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Solar Pro 4 is 5.3x cheaper per token. Solar Pro 4 has the larger context window (512K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
Grok 4.6 leads
Cheaper per token
Solar Pro 4
5.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Solar Pro 4
512K tokens
Providers
2 providers
xAI · Upstage
Grok 4.6
xAI · released 2026-08-12
textvision
Context
500K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
43 · 9 core
Solar Pro 4
Upstage · released 2026-08-20
text
Context
512K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.3 ↗
Output /1M
$1.2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.06
Scores
5 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Solar Pro 4ΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
LMArena Elo1453.8 ↗1377.3 ↗+76.5Grok 4.6
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index61 ↗42 ↗+19Grok 4.6
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0128 ↗-0.159 ↗+0.2Grok 4.6
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1619.5 ↗1370.2 ↗+249.3Grok 4.6
Only Grok 4.6 reports · 34
GPQA Diamond94% ↗epoch runnot reported——
AA-Briefcase1577 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents57.5% ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)65.3% ↗not reported——
APEX-SWE56.4% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)40% ↗epoch runnot reported——
CursorBench 3.269.9% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.165.9% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)67.5% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)30.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended)61.3% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)31.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)66% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)25.3% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)40% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPVal-AA v21753 ↗not reported——
Harvey LAB (Vals)15.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)57% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)76.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)71.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)83.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)90.5% ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1263.5 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)34% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)99.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)75.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified49.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 3.026% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)17.2% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)9047.03 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)67.3% ↗not reported——
Only Solar Pro 4 reports · 0
Solar Pro 4 reports nothing Grok 4.6 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4.6 minus Solar Pro 4 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok 4.6Solar Pro 4Edge
Context window500K tokens512K tokensSolar Pro 4
Max output———
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.3 ↗Solar Pro 4
Output price / 1M$6 ↗$1.2 ↗Solar Pro 4
Cached input / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.06 ↗Solar Pro 4
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$8$1.5Solar Pro 4
Modalitiestext · visiontextGrok 4.6
Released2026-08-122026-08-20—
Cited benchmark scores435—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Grok 4.6 vs …

More matchups

Solar Pro 4 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4.6 and Solar Pro 4 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.