Compare / head-to-head

Kimi K2vsKimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 leads 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window (256K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 5
Kimi K2.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Kimi K2.5
256K tokens
Providers
Moonshot AI
same provider
Kimi K2
Moonshot AI · released 2025-07-11
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 7 core
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI · released 2026-01-27
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
26 · 14 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5ΔEdge
Reported by both · 5
MMLU-Pro81.1% ↗87.1% ↗-6 ptKimi K2.5
AIME 202549.5% ↗96.1% ↗-46.6 ptKimi K2.5
GPQA-Diamond75.1% ↗87.6% ↗-12.5 ptKimi K2.5
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)26.3% ↗46.8% ↗-20.5 ptKimi K2.5
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)39.4% ↗45.6% ↗-6.2 ptKimi K2.5
Only Kimi K2 reports · 13
Aider-Polyglot60% ↗not reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)2% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (Text Only)4.7% ↗not reported——
IFEval (Prompt Strict)89.8% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench v6 (Aug 24 - May 25)53.7% ↗not reported——
MMLU-Redux92.7% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA31% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Multilingual (Agentic Coding, single attempt)47.3% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Verified (Agentic Coding, single attempt)65.8% ↗not reported——
Tau2 airline56.5% ↗not reported——
Tau2 retail70.6% ↗not reported——
Tau2 telecom65.8% ↗not reported——
TerminalBench (Inhouse Framework)30% ↗not reported——
Only Kimi K2.5 reports · 21
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported76.8% ↗——
LMArena Elonot reported1450.1 ↗——
BrowseCompnot reported60.6% ↗——
HLE-Fullnot reported30.1% ↗——
HLE-Full (w/ tools)not reported50.2% ↗——
HMMT 2025 (Feb)not reported95.4% ↗——
IMO-AnswerBenchnot reported81.8% ↗——
LiveCodeBench (v6)not reported85% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1252.2 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1435.8 ↗——
MMMU-Pronot reported78.5% ↗——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)not reported63.3% ↗——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported49.9% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported34.3% ↗epoch run——
SWE-Bench Multilingualnot reported73% ↗——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported50.7% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported73.8% ↗epoch run——
Terminal Bench 2.0not reported50.8% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported33% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported1198.46 ↗——
VideoMMMUnot reported86.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Kimi K2 minus Kimi K2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecKimi K2Kimi K2.5Edge
Context window128K tokens256K tokensKimi K2.5
Max output———
Input price / 1M———
Output price / 1M———
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
———
Modalitiestexttext · vision · videoKimi K2.5
Released2025-07-112026-01-27—
Cited benchmark scores1826—
Reliability

Moonshot AI status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.