Compare / head-to-head
North Mini CodevsStep 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Both offer a 256K-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
Step 3.7 Flash leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · StepFun
North Mini Code
Cohere · released 2026-06-09
text
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- 64K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 2 core
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · released 2026-05-29
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 19 · 6 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 4 only North Mini Code · 17 only Step 3.7 Flash| Benchmark | North Mini Code | Step 3.7 Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 67.6% ↗ | 76.5% ↗ | -8.9 pt | Step 3.7 Flash |
| SWE-bench Pro | 40.2% ↗ | 56.3% ↗ | -16.1 pt | Step 3.7 Flash |
| Only North Mini Code reports · 4 | ||||
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 70.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SciCode | 38.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 31.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench v2 | 36% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Step 3.7 Flash reports · 17 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 95% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| AA-LCR | not reported | 63.9% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 75.8% ↗ | — | — |
| ClawEval v1.1 | not reported | 67.1% ↗ | — | — |
| DeepSearchQA Accuracy | not reported | 81.7% ↗ | — | — |
| DeepSearchQA F1 | not reported | 92.8% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval-Stirrup | not reported | 1415.8 ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval-Stirrup Intelligence Index | not reported | 45.8 ↗ | — | — |
| HLE (with tools, text-only) | not reported | 49.7% ↗ | — | — |
| HLE (with tools) | not reported | 47.2% ↗ | — | — |
| ResearchRubrics | not reported | 71.7% ↗ | — | — |
| SimpleVQA (with tools) | not reported | 79.2% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | not reported | 72.4% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | not reported | 59.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Toolathlon | not reported | 49.5% ↗ | — | — |
| V* (with Python) | not reported | 95.3% ↗ | — | — |
| WorldVQA (with visual search) | not reported | 58.1% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is North Mini Code minus Step 3.7 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | North Mini Code | Step 3.7 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 256K tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 64K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Step 3.7 Flash |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-05-29 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 19 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
North Mini Code vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Step 3.7 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run North Mini Code and Step 3.7 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.