Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507vsQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 split their 12 shared benchmarks evenly. Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is 2.3x cheaper per token. Both offer a 262K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
6 – 6
even split
Cheaper per token
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
2.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-21
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$0.92 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 6 core
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-31
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$2.4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 12
MMLU-Pro83% ↗80.9% ↗+2.1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
AIME2570.3% ↗85% ↗-14.7 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Arena-Hard v279.2% ↗56% ↗+23.2 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
BFCL-v370.9% ↗72.4% ↗-1.5 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
GPQA77.5% ↗73.4% ↗+4.1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
HMMT2555.4% ↗71.4% ↗-16 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
IFEval88.7% ↗88.9% ↗-0.2 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
LiveBench 2024112575.4% ↗76.8% ↗-1.4 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)51.8% ↗66% ↗-14.2 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Redux93.1% ↗91.4% ↗+1.7 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
SuperGPQA62.6% ↗56.8% ↗+5.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
TAU2-Retail74.6% ↗58.8% ↗+15.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 reports · 5
LMArena Elo1422.4 ↗not reported——
Aider-Polyglot57.3% ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI41.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA54.3% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)38.7% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 reports · 6
GPQA Diamondnot reported70.1% ↗epoch run——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported8% ↗epoch run——
OJBenchnot reported25.1% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported70.3% ↗epoch run——
TAU2-Airlinenot reported58% ↗——
TAU2-Telecomnot reported26.3% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 minus Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507Edge
Context window262K tokens262K tokensTie
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.23 ↗$0.2 ↗Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Output price / 1M$0.92 ↗$2.4 ↗Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.15$2.6Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-07-212025-07-31—
Cited benchmark scores1718—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.