Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3 4B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads 15 of 15 shared benchmarks. Both offer a 262K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
15 – 0
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Qwen · released 2025-08-06
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 15
GPQA Diamond80.1% ↗epoch run45.8% ↗epoch run+34.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Pro84.4% ↗69.6% ↗+14.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
AIME2592.3% ↗47.4% ↗+44.9 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Arena-Hard v279.7% ↗43.4% ↗+36.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
BFCL-v371.9% ↗61.9% ↗+10 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)12% ↗epoch run4% ↗epoch run+8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
GPQA81.1% ↗62% ↗+19.1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
HMMT2583.9% ↗31% ↗+52.9 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
IFEval87.8% ↗83.4% ↗+4.4 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LiveBench 2024112578.4% ↗63% ↗+15.4 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)74.1% ↗35.1% ↗+39 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Redux93.8% ↗84.2% ↗+9.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)86.7% ↗epoch run52.2% ↗epoch run+34.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
SuperGPQA64.9% ↗42.8% ↗+22.1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
TAU2-Retail71.9% ↗40.4% ↗+31.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 8
LMArena Elo1400 ↗not reported——
HLE (text-only)18.2% ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OJBench32.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified40.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
TAU2-Airline58% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)-11.34 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)41% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 reports · 3
Aider-Polyglotnot reported12.9% ↗——
MultiPL-Enot reported76.8% ↗——
ZebraLogicnot reported80.2% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 minus Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507Edge
Context window262K tokens262K tokensTie
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.23 ↗——
Output price / 1M$2.3 ↗——
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.53——
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-07-252025-08-06—
Cited benchmark scores2318—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.