ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Claude Opus 4.8vsGLM-5.3-Flash

Claude Opus 4.8 leads 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is 46.2x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
4 – 2
Claude Opus 4.8 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-5.3-Flash
46.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Z.ai
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · released 2026-05-28
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$5
Output /1M
$25
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
17 · 13 core
GLM-5.3-Flash
Z.ai · released 2026-09-16
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.15
Output /1M
$0.5
Cached /1M
$0.03
Scores
19 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8GLM-5.3-FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 6
GPQA Diamond93.6% 90.2% epoch+3.4 ptClaude Opus 4.8
LMArena Elo1452.7 1471.9 -19.2GLM-5.3-Flash
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% epoch17.1% epoch+39 ptClaude Opus 4.8
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)80% epoch55.8% epoch+24.2 ptClaude Opus 4.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.3% epoch93.9% epoch+4.4 ptClaude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench 2.174.6% 84.3% -9.7 ptGLM-5.3-Flash
Only Claude Opus 4.8 reports · 10
SWE-bench Verified88.6% not reported
AIME 2026100% matharenanot reported
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)49.8% not reported
BrowseComp84.3% not reported
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)57.9% not reported
OSWorld-Verified83.4% not reported
SimpleQA Verified53% epochnot reported
SWE-bench Multilingual84.4% not reported
SWE-bench Multimodal38.4% not reported
SWE-Bench Pro69.2% not reported
Only GLM-5.3-Flash reports · 13
Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI)not reported26.3%
AutomationBench v1.0.6not reported48.8%
BabyVisionnot reported53.4%
Chartography (with tools)not reported78%
CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)not reported89.4%
DeepSWE v1.1not reported63.4%
GDPval-AA v2not reported1773
HLE (with tools)not reported55.3%
MMVUnot reported80.5%
MVBenchnot reported77.8%
NL2Reponot reported56.3%
OfficeQA Pronot reported62.4%
Toolathlon Verifiednot reported78.4%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4.8 minus GLM-5.3-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.8GLM-5.3-FlashEdge
Context window1M tokens1M tokensTie
Max output128K tokens131K tokensGLM-5.3-Flash
Input price / 1M$5 $0.15 GLM-5.3-Flash
Output price / 1M$25 $0.5 GLM-5.3-Flash
Cached input / 1M$0.5 $0.03 GLM-5.3-Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$30$0.65GLM-5.3-Flash
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-05-282026-09-16
Cited benchmark scores1719
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Claude Opus 4.8 vs …

More matchups

GLM-5.3-Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.3-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.