ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-5.3vsGLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3 leads 8 of 12 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is 8.9x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
8 – 4
GLM-5.3 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-5.3-Flash
8.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
Z.ai
GLM-5.3
Z.ai · released 2026-08-14
text
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$1.4
Output /1M
$4.4
Cached /1M
$0.26
Scores
33 · 6 core
GLM-5.3-Flash
Z.ai · released 2026-09-16
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.15
Output /1M
$0.5
Cached /1M
$0.03
Scores
19 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-5.3GLM-5.3-FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 12
GPQA Diamond90.9% epoch90.2% epoch+0.7 ptGLM-5.3
Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI)28.5% 26.3% +2.2 ptGLM-5.3
AutomationBench v1.0.648.2% 48.8% -0.6 ptGLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE v1.166.9% 63.4% +3.5 ptGLM-5.3
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)29.3% epoch17.1% epoch+12.2 ptGLM-5.3
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)68.8% epoch55.8% epoch+13 ptGLM-5.3
GDPval-AA v21769 1773 -4GLM-5.3-Flash
HLE (with tools)62.5% 55.3% +7.2 ptGLM-5.3
NL2Repo58% 56.3% +1.7 ptGLM-5.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)91.1% epoch93.9% epoch-2.8 ptGLM-5.3-Flash
Terminal-Bench 2.188.2% 84.3% +3.9 ptGLM-5.3
Toolathlon Verified73% 78.4% -5.4 ptGLM-5.3-Flash
Only GLM-5.3 reports · 12
Agents' Last Exam28.5% not reported
CyberGym84.5% not reported
ExploitBench54.4% not reported
ExploitGym 2h105 not reported
ExploitGym 6h130 not reported
FrontierSWE78.1% not reported
PostTrainBench39.8% not reported
ProgramBench (Almost Solved)19% not reported
SimpleQA Verified41% epochnot reported
SWE-Marathon v1.142.5% not reported
Terminal-Bench 3.028.3% not reported
Z.ai Code Bench (max effort)34.5% not reported
Only GLM-5.3-Flash reports · 7
LMArena Elonot reported1471.9
BabyVisionnot reported53.4%
Chartography (with tools)not reported78%
CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)not reported89.4%
MMVUnot reported80.5%
MVBenchnot reported77.8%
OfficeQA Pronot reported62.4%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.3 minus GLM-5.3-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-5.3GLM-5.3-FlashEdge
Context window1M tokens1M tokensTie
Max output131K tokens131K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$1.4 $0.15 GLM-5.3-Flash
Output price / 1M$4.4 $0.5 GLM-5.3-Flash
Cached input / 1M$0.26 $0.03 GLM-5.3-Flash
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$5.8$0.65GLM-5.3-Flash
Modalitiestexttext · visionGLM-5.3-Flash
Released2026-08-142026-09-16
Cited benchmark scores3319
Reliability

Z.ai status

All providers
More matchups

GLM-5.3 vs …

More matchups

GLM-5.3-Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.