Compare / head-to-head
Claude Sonnet 4.6vsGPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads 10 of 11 shared benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.9x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 10
GPT-5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 95.4286%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · released 2026-02-17
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
11 shared · 7 only Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 10 only GPT-5.5| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 11 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 89.9% ↗ | 90.7% ↗epoch | -0.8 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Elo | 1458.3 ↗ | 1465.6 ↗ | -7.3 | GPT-5.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 58.3% ↗ | 85% ↗ | -26.7 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| MCP Atlas | 61.3% ↗ | 75.3% ↗ | -14 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | 74.5% ↗ | 81.2% ↗ | -6.7 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 75.6% ↗ | 83.2% ↗ | -7.6 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| OSWorld-Verified | 72.5% ↗ | 78.7% ↗ | -6.2 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 85.8% ↗epoch | 84.4% ↗epoch | +1.4 pt | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% ↗epoch | 63% ↗epoch | -27.5 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | 97.9% ↗ | 98% ↗ | -0.1 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 59.1% ↗ | 82.7% ↗ | -23.6 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 reports · 7 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 33.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1633 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 49% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMLU | 89.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 75.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Retail | 91.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.5 reports · 10 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 95% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 84.4% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | not reported | 51.7% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | not reported | 35.4% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 72.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 85.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 84.9% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 58.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Toolathlon | not reported | 55.6% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 4.6 minus GPT-5.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens | Tie |
| Input price / 1M | $3 ↗ | $5 ↗ | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Output price / 1M | $15 ↗ | $30 ↗ | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.3 ↗ | $0.5 ↗ | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $18 | $35 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 19 | 21 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.