Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5.2vsGPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads 9 of 11 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.2 is 2.2x cheaper per token. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 9
GPT-5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-5.2
2.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.5
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
95.4416%
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
11 shared · 3 only GPT-5.2 · 10 only GPT-5.5| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.5 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 11 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 92.4% ↗ | 90.7% ↗epoch | +1.7 pt | GPT-5.2 |
| AIME 2026 | 98.3% ↗matharena | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | -1.7 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Elo | 1412.4 ↗ | 1465.6 ↗ | -53.2 | GPT-5.5 |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | 86.2% ↗ | 95% ↗ | -8.8 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 52.9% ↗ | 85% ↗ | -32.1 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | 72.5% ↗epoch | -40.8 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 67.4% ↗epoch | 85.3% ↗epoch | -17.9 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | 70.9% ↗ | 84.9% ↗ | -14 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 96.1% ↗epoch | 84.4% ↗epoch | +11.7 pt | GPT-5.2 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 37.1% ↗epoch | 63% ↗epoch | -25.9 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.6% ↗ | 58.6% ↗ | -3 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Only GPT-5.2 reports · 3 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 80% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 100% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 73.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.5 reports · 10 | ||||
| BrowseComp | not reported | 84.4% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | not reported | 51.7% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | not reported | 35.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | not reported | 75.3% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | not reported | 81.2% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | not reported | 83.2% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | not reported | 78.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | not reported | 98% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | not reported | 82.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Toolathlon | not reported | 55.6% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.2 minus GPT-5.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1M tokens | GPT-5.5 |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens | Tie |
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 ↗ | $5 ↗ | GPT-5.2 |
| Output price / 1M | $14 ↗ | $30 ↗ | GPT-5.2 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.175 ↗ | $0.5 ↗ | GPT-5.2 |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $15.75 | $35 | GPT-5.2 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 16 | 21 | — |
Reliability
OpenAI status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-5.2 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.