Compare / head-to-head
Claude Sonnet 5vsLlama 4 Maverick
Claude Sonnet 5 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Anthropic · Meta
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic · released 2026-06-30
textvision
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · released 2025-04-05
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 7 only Claude Sonnet 5 · 1 only Llama 4 Maverick| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% ↗epoch | 69.8% ↗ | +20.7 pt | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Only Claude Sonnet 5 reports · 7 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 85.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 43.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 29.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 65.6% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | 57.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 94.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Llama 4 Maverick reports · 1 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 80.5% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Sonnet 5 minus Llama 4 Maverick in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Sonnet 5 | Llama 4 Maverick | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $12 | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-06-30 | 2025-04-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 2 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Sonnet 5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Llama 4 Maverick vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Sonnet 5 and Llama 4 Maverick on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.