Compare / head-to-head

DeepSeek V3.1-TerminusvsGPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GPT-6 Luna leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
DeepSeek · OpenAI
DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus
DeepSeek · released 2025-09-22
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
12 · 5 core
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1-TerminusGPT-6 LunaΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1417.2 ↗1442.9 ↗-25.7GPT-6 Luna
Only DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus reports · 11
MMLU-Pro85% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)21.7% ↗not reported——
Aider-Polyglot76.1% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp38.5% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp-zh45% ↗not reported——
GPQA-Diamond80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench74.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA (agentic tool use)96.8% ↗not reported——
SWE Verified68.4% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Multilingual57.8% ↗not reported——
Terminal-bench36.7% ↗not reported——
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 21
GPQA Diamondnot reported90.5% ↗epoch run——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported44.3% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported31% ↗epoch run——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported66.6% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported56.1% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported78.9% ↗epoch run——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported44.2% ↗epoch run——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported51.2% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported79% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported73.4% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported55.9% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported73.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported89.1% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.0135 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1578.7 ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported7% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported98.9% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported48.1% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported41.4% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported13.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus minus GPT-6 Luna in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDeepSeek V3.1-TerminusGPT-6 LunaEdge
Context window128K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output—128K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$0.1 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$0.5 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.01 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$0.6—
Modalitiestexttext · visionGPT-6 Luna
Released2025-09-222026-09-22—
Cited benchmark scores1222—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus vs …

More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.1-Terminus and GPT-6 Luna on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.