Compare / head-to-head

DeepSeek V3.2-ExpvsGPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
DeepSeek · OpenAI
DeepSeek V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek · released 2025-09-29
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2-ExpGPT-6.1 SolΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
LMArena Elo1424.9 ↗1483.2 ↗-58.3GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1271.8 ↗1757.8 ↗-486GPT-6.1 Sol
Only DeepSeek V3.2-Exp reports · 15
MMLU-Pro85% ↗not reported——
AIME 202589.3% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)19.8% ↗not reported——
Aider-Polyglot74.5% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp40.1% ↗not reported——
BrowseComp-zh47.9% ↗not reported——
GPQA-Diamond79.9% ↗not reported——
HMMT 202583.6% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench74.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA (agentic tool use)97.1% ↗not reported——
SWE Verified67.8% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Multilingual57.9% ↗not reported——
Terminal-bench37.7% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)1034 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)39.5% ↗not reported——
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 22
GPQA Diamondnot reported95.4% ↗epoch run——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported60% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported61% ↗epoch run——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported54.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported93.7% ↗epoch run——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported80% ↗epoch run——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported56.8% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported80.7% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported82.7% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported74.2% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported90.1% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported96.8% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported92.6% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.1123 ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1290.6 ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported80% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported100% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported46.5% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported82.9% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported73.9% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported55.1% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.2-Exp minus GPT-6.1 Sol in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDeepSeek V3.2-ExpGPT-6.1 SolEdge
Context window128K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output—128K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$2 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$10 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.1 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$12—
Modalitiestexttext · visionGPT-6.1 Sol
Released2025-09-292026-09-29—
Cited benchmark scores1724—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

DeepSeek V3.2-Exp vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.2-Exp and GPT-6.1 Sol on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.