Compare / head-to-head

DeepSeek V3.2-SpecialevsGPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 leads 3 of 4 shared benchmarks.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 3
GPT-5.2 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
DeepSeek · OpenAI
DeepSeek V3.2-Speciale
DeepSeek · released 2025-12-01
text
Context
—
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
9 · 4 core
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$1.75 ↗
Output /1M
$14 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.175
Scores
45 · 13 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2-SpecialeGPT-5.2ΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
GPQA Diamond85.7% ↗92.4% ↗-6.7 ptGPT-5.2
AIME 202596% ↗100% ↗-4 ptGPT-5.2
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)52.6% ↗45.8% ↗+6.8 ptDeepSeek V3.2-Speciale
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)46.7% ↗72.2% ↗-25.5 ptGPT-5.2
Only DeepSeek V3.2-Speciale reports · 5
HLE (text-only)30.6% ↗not reported——
HMMT Feb 202599.2% ↗not reported——
HMMT Nov 202594.4% ↗not reported——
IMOAnswerBench84.5% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (Pass@1-COT)88.7% ↗not reported——
Only GPT-5.2 reports · 32
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported80% ↗——
AIME 2026not reported98.3% ↗matharena——
LMArena Elonot reported1412.4 ↗——
ARC-AGI-1 (Verified)not reported86.2% ↗——
ARC-AGI-2 (Verified)not reported52.9% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported49% ↗epoch run——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)not reported23% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported31.7% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported67.4% ↗epoch run——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)not reported38.3% ↗epoch run——
GDPval (wins or ties)not reported70.9% ↗——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)not reported26.5% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported50.3% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported76.1% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported78.2% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported61.8% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported79.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported93.2% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported83.2% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1242.8 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1415.5 ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported23% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported96.1% ↗epoch run——
SAGE (Vals AI)not reported49.3% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported37.1% ↗epoch run——
SWE-Bench Pronot reported55.6% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported73.8% ↗epoch run——
tau2-bench Airline (Sierra)not reported83% ↗——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)not reported32.2% ↗——
tau2-bench Retail (Sierra)not reported81.6% ↗——
tau2-bench Telecom (Sierra)not reported89.7% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported3591.33 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.2-Speciale minus GPT-5.2 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecDeepSeek V3.2-SpecialeGPT-5.2Edge
Context window—400K tokens—
Max output—128K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$1.75 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$14 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.175 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$15.75—
Modalitiestexttext · visionGPT-5.2
Released2025-12-012025-12-11—
Cited benchmark scores945—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

DeepSeek V3.2-Speciale vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.2-Speciale and GPT-5.2 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.