Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.0vs
MiniMax M1
ERNIE 5.0 leads 6 of 6 shared benchmarks. MiniMax M1 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
6 – 0
ERNIE 5.0 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
MiniMax M1
1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Baidu · MiniMax
ERNIE 5.0
Baidu · released 2026-02-06
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 22 · 6 core
MiniMax M1
MiniMax · released 2025-06-16
text
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 16 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
6 shared · 16 only ERNIE 5.0 · 10 only MiniMax M1| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 | MiniMax M1 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 6 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 86.36% ↗ | 70% ↗ | +16.4 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.8% ↗ | 81.1% ↗ | +2.7 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| AIME 2025 | 89.06% ↗ | 76.9% ↗ | +12.2 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| LMArena Elo | 1446.4 ↗ | 1363.9 ↗ | +82.5 | ERNIE 5.0 |
| SimpleQA | 74.01% ↗ | 18.5% ↗ | +55.5 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| ZebraLogic | 96.5% ↗ | 86.8% ↗ | +9.7 pt | ERNIE 5.0 |
| Only ERNIE 5.0 reports · 16 | ||||
| ACEBench Chinese | 89.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ACEBench English | 87.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BBEH | 66.63% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BFCL v4 | 66.47% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 64.71% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ChineseSimpleQA | 86.03% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HMMT 2025 | 79.58% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | 94.48% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 93.35% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 76.21% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MBPP+ | 82.54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Multi-IF | 85.56% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MultiChallenge | 65.98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SpreadsheetBench | 40.08% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-Bench | 78.79% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only MiniMax M1 reports · 10 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 56% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 86% ↗ | — | — |
| FullStackBench | not reported | 68.3% ↗ | — | — |
| HLE (no tools) | not reported | 8.4% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench (24/8~25/5) | not reported | 65% ↗ | — | — |
| LongBench-v2 | not reported | 61.5% ↗ | — | — |
| MATH-500 | not reported | 96.8% ↗ | — | — |
| OpenAI-MRCR (128k) | not reported | 73.4% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU-bench (airline) | not reported | 62% ↗ | — | — |
| TAU-bench (retail) | not reported | 63.5% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.0 minus MiniMax M1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.0 | MiniMax M1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens | MiniMax M1 |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | ERNIE 5.0 |
| Released | 2026-02-06 | 2025-06-16 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 22 | 16 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
MiniMax M1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.0 and MiniMax M1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.