Compare / head-to-head
Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewvs
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 7 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is 1.5x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
7 – 3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
1.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Google · Qwen
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · released 2026-02-19
textvisionaudio
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Qwen · released 2026-04-18
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
10 shared · 26 only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · 7 only Qwen3.6-Max-Preview| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 10 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 94.3% ↗ | 87.4% ↗epoch run | +6.9 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena Elo | 1480.1 ↗ | 1460.3 ↗ | +19.8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 55% ↗epoch run | 20% ↗epoch run | +35 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| LMArena WebDev (LMArena) | 1446.2 ↗ | 1481.5 ↗ | -35.3 | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 34% ↗epoch run | 19% ↗epoch run | +15 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 95.6% ↗epoch run | 91.1% ↗epoch run | +4.5 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| SimpleBench (SimpleBench) | 79.6% ↗ | 63% ↗ | +16.6 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% ↗epoch run | 52% ↗epoch run | +21.5 pt | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 75.6% ↗epoch run | 76.7% ↗epoch run | -1.1 pt | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 3774.25 ↗ | 4254.19 ↗ | -479.9 | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reports · 26 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 98.3% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 35.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BALROG (BALROG) | 57% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve) | 11.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| EBR-bench (Epoch AI run) | 14.3% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 26.8% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 59.6% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run) | 26.7% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| GSO Opt@1 (GSO) | 21.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 44.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 76.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 78.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 79.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 85.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 91% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 84% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | -0.0771 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Vision (LMArena) | 1279.3 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MirrorCode (Epoch AI run) | 8.9% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 54.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra) | 26% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI) | 2.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST) | 61.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle) | 72.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.6-Max-Preview reports · 7 | ||||
| NL2Repo | not reported | 42.9% ↗ | — | — |
| QwenClawBench | not reported | 59% ↗ | — | — |
| SciCode | not reported | 47% ↗ | — | — |
| SkillsBench | not reported | 55.6% ↗ | — | — |
| SuperGPQA | not reported | 73.9% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | not reported | 57.3% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2) | not reported | 65.4% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview minus Qwen3.6-Max-Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 256K tokens | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | $1.3 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Output price / 1M | $12 ↗ | $7.8 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.2 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $14 | $9.1 | Qwen3.6-Max-Preview |
| Modalities | text · vision · audio | text | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2026-04-18 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 43 | 17 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.6-Max-Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.