Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.5VvsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GLM-4.5V is 2.3x cheaper per token. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.5V
2.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Z.ai · Meta
GLM-4.5V
Z.ai · released 2025-08-11
textvisionvideo
Context
64K
Max out
16K
Input /1M
$0.6 ↗
Output /1M
$1.8 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.11
Scores
17 · 2 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMuse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
LMArena Elo1352.4 ↗1494.3 ↗-141.9Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1152.7 ↗1290.2 ↗-137.5Muse Spark 1.3
Only GLM-4.5V reports · 15
AndroidWorld57% ↗not reported——
ChartQAPro64% ↗not reported——
Design2Code82.2% ↗not reported——
MathVision65.6% ↗not reported——
MathVista84.6% ↗not reported——
MMBench v1.188.2% ↗not reported——
MMLongBench-Doc44.7% ↗not reported——
MMMU (val)75.4% ↗not reported——
MMMU Pro65.2% ↗not reported——
MMStar75.3% ↗not reported——
OCRBench86.5% ↗not reported——
OSWorld35.8% ↗not reported——
VideoMME (w/o sub)74.6% ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU72.4% ↗not reported——
WebVoyagerSom84.4% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 27
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported57.8% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported38% ↗epoch run——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported75.4% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported64.1% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported81.1% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported79.6% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported78% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported82.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported95.9% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported89.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.04 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1656.6 ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported99.2% ↗epoch run——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported24.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.5V minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.5VMuse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window64K tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output16K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.6 ↗$1.25 ↗GLM-4.5V
Output price / 1M$1.8 ↗$4.25 ↗GLM-4.5V
Cached input / 1M$0.11 ↗$0.15 ↗GLM-4.5V
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.4$5.5GLM-4.5V
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · videoTie
Released2025-08-112026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores1729—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.5V and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.