Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.6V-FlashvsPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct

GLM-4.6V-Flash leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 128K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
GLM-4.6V-Flash leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Providers
2 providers
Z.ai · Microsoft
GLM-4.6V-Flash
Z.ai · released 2025-12-08
textvisionvideo
Context
128K
Max out
32K
Input /1M
$0 ↗
Output /1M
$0 ↗
Cached /1M
$0
Scores
15 · 0 core
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Microsoft · released 2025-02-26
textvisionaudio
Context
128K
Max out
4K
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
19 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.6V-FlashPhi-4 Multimodal InstructΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
OCRBench84.7% ↗84.4% ↗+0.3 ptGLM-4.6V-Flash
Only GLM-4.6V-Flash reports · 14
AndroidWorld42.7% ↗not reported——
ChartQAPro62.6% ↗not reported——
CharXiv_Val-Reasoning59.6% ↗not reported——
Design2Code69.8% ↗not reported——
MathVista82.7% ↗not reported——
MMBench V1.186.9% ↗not reported——
MMBrowseComp7.1% ↗not reported——
MMLongBench-Doc53% ↗not reported——
MMMU (Val)71.1% ↗not reported——
MMMU_Pro60.6% ↗not reported——
MMStar74.7% ↗not reported——
OSWorld21.1% ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU70.1% ↗not reported——
WebVoyager71.8% ↗not reported——
Only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct reports · 18
AI2Dnot reported82.3% ↗——
BLINKnot reported61.3% ↗——
ChartQAnot reported81.4% ↗——
DocVQAnot reported93.2% ↗——
InfoVQAnot reported72.7% ↗——
InterGPSnot reported48.6% ↗——
MathVista testmininot reported62.4% ↗——
MMBench (dev-en)not reported86.7% ↗——
MMMUnot reported55.1% ↗——
MMMU-Pro (standard/vision)not reported38.5% ↗——
POPEnot reported85.6% ↗——
ScienceQA Visualnot reported97.5% ↗——
Speech AI2Dnot reported68.9% ↗——
Speech ChartQAnot reported69% ↗——
Speech DocVQAnot reported87.3% ↗——
Speech InfoVQAnot reported63.7% ↗——
TextVQA (val)not reported75.6% ↗——
Video-MME (16 frames)not reported55% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.6V-Flash minus Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.6V-FlashPhi-4 Multimodal InstructEdge
Context window128K tokens128K tokensTie
Max output32K tokens4K tokensGLM-4.6V-Flash
Input price / 1M$0 ↗——
Output price / 1M$0 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0——
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · audioTie
Released2025-12-082025-02-26—
Cited benchmark scores1519—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.6V-Flash and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.