Compare / head-to-head

GLM-4.6VvsQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. GLM-4.6V is 3.7x cheaper per token. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking has the larger context window (256K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 4
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.6V
3.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
256K tokens
Providers
2 providers
Z.ai · Qwen
GLM-4.6V
Z.ai · released 2025-12-08
textvisionvideo
Context
128K
Max out
32K
Input /1M
$0.3 ↗
Output /1M
$0.9 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
17 · 2 core
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Qwen · released 2025-09-23
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.4 ↗
Output /1M
$4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-4.6VQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
LMArena Elo1378.7 ↗1395 ↗-16.3Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1161.5 ↗1188 ↗-26.5Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
MMMU_Pro66% ↗69.3% ↗-3.3 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
OSWorld37.2% ↗38.1% ↗-0.9 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Only GLM-4.6V reports · 13
AndroidWorld57% ↗not reported——
ChartQAPro65.5% ↗not reported——
CharXiv_Val-Reasoning63.2% ↗not reported——
Design2Code88.6% ↗not reported——
MathVista85.2% ↗not reported——
MMBench V1.188.8% ↗not reported——
MMBrowseComp7.6% ↗not reported——
MMLongBench-Doc54.9% ↗not reported——
MMMU (Val)76% ↗not reported——
MMStar75.9% ↗not reported——
OCRBench86.5% ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU74.7% ↗not reported——
WebVoyager81% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking reports · 13
MMLU-Pronot reported83.8% ↗——
AIME25not reported89.7% ↗——
BFCLnot reported71.9% ↗——
HLEnot reported13.6% ↗——
HMMT25not reported77.4% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported88.2% ↗——
LCB v6not reported70.1% ↗——
MathVista (mini)not reported85.8% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported93.7% ↗——
MMMU (val)not reported80.6% ↗——
SimpleQAnot reported44.4% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported64.3% ↗——
VideoMME (w/o sub)not reported79% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.6V minus Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-4.6VQwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingEdge
Context window128K tokens256K tokensQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Max output32K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.3 ↗$0.4 ↗GLM-4.6V
Output price / 1M$0.9 ↗$4 ↗GLM-4.6V
Cached input / 1M$0.05 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.2$4.4GLM-4.6V
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · videoTie
Released2025-12-082025-09-23—
Cited benchmark scores1717—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.6V and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.