Compare / head-to-head

GPT-5.2vsKimi K2-0905

GPT-5.2 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.2 has the larger context window (400K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
GPT-5.2 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.2
400K tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Moonshot AI
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$1.75 ↗
Output /1M
$14 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.175
Scores
45 · 13 core
Kimi K2-0905
Moonshot AI · released 2025-09-05
text
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
6 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-5.2Kimi K2-0905ΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
SWE-bench Verified80% ↗69.2% ↗+10.8 ptGPT-5.2
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)72.2% ↗36.7% ↗+35.5 ptGPT-5.2
Only GPT-5.2 reports · 34
GPQA Diamond92.4% ↗not reported——
AIME 2025100% ↗not reported——
AIME 202698.3% ↗matharenanot reported——
LMArena Elo1412.4 ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI-1 (Verified)86.2% ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI-2 (Verified)52.9% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)49% ↗epoch runnot reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)23% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)31.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)67.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)38.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPval (wins or ties)70.9% ↗not reported——
GSO Opt@1 (GSO)26.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)50.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)76.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)61.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)79.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)93.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)83.2% ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1242.8 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1415.5 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)23% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)96.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)49.3% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)45.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified37.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SWE-Bench Pro55.6% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)73.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
tau2-bench Airline (Sierra)83% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra)32.2% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Retail (Sierra)81.6% ↗not reported——
tau2-bench Telecom (Sierra)89.7% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)3591.33 ↗not reported——
Only Kimi K2-0905 reports · 4
Multi-SWE-Benchnot reported33.5% ↗——
SWE-Bench Multilingualnot reported55.9% ↗——
SWE-Devnot reported66.6% ↗——
Terminal-Bench (Terminus-2)not reported44.5% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.2 minus Kimi K2-0905 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-5.2Kimi K2-0905Edge
Context window400K tokens256K tokensGPT-5.2
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$1.75 ↗——
Output price / 1M$14 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.175 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$15.75——
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-5.2
Released2025-12-112025-09-05—
Cited benchmark scores456—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.2 and Kimi K2-0905 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.