Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6.1 SolvsQwen3.6-Max-Preview

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 8 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is 1.3x cheaper per token. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
8 – 0
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
1.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Qwen · released 2026-04-18
text
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.3 ↗
Output /1M
$7.8 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.6-Max-PreviewΔEdge
Reported by both · 8
GPQA Diamond95.4% ↗epoch run87.4% ↗epoch run+8 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Elo1483.2 ↗1460.3 ↗+22.9GPT-6.1 Sol
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch run20% ↗epoch run+41 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1757.8 ↗1481.5 ↗+276.3GPT-6.1 Sol
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch run19% ↗epoch run+61 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run91.1% ↗epoch run+8.9 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.9% ↗63% ↗+19.9 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
SimpleQA Verified73.9% ↗epoch run52% ↗epoch run+21.9 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 16
APEX-Agents (Mercor)60% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)54.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1123 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.6 ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.5% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)55.1% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3.6-Max-Preview reports · 9
NL2Reponot reported42.9% ↗——
QwenClawBenchnot reported59% ↗——
SciCodenot reported47% ↗——
SkillsBenchnot reported55.6% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported73.9% ↗——
SWE-bench Pronot reported57.3% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported76.7% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2)not reported65.4% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported4254.19 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6.1 Sol minus Qwen3.6-Max-Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.6-Max-PreviewEdge
Context window1.1M tokens256K tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$1.3 ↗Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$7.8 ↗Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$9.1Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6.1 Sol
Released2026-09-292026-04-18—
Cited benchmark scores2417—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.6-Max-Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.