Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsGrok 4.1 Fast Reasoning

GPT-6 Luna leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is 1.2x cheaper per token. Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning has the larger context window (2M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GPT-6 Luna leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
1.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
2M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · xAI
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
xAI · released 2025-11-19
text
Context
2M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
7 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGrok 4.1 Fast ReasoningΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗1430.3 ↗+12.6GPT-6 Luna
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗1241.3 ↗+337.4GPT-6 Luna
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗31.3% ↗+16.8 ptGPT-6 Luna
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 19
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗not reported——
Only Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning reports · 4
FRAMES (Agent Tools API)not reported87.6% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1196.3 ↗——
Research-Eval Reka (Agent Tools API)not reported63.9% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported1106.63 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaGrok 4.1 Fast ReasoningEdge
Context window1.1M tokens2M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast Reasoning
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.2 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.5 ↗Tie
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗$0.05 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$0.7GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6 Luna
Released2026-09-222025-11-19—
Cited benchmark scores227—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

More matchups

Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.