Compare / head-to-head

Grok 4vsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 5
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
xAI · Meta
Grok 4
xAI · released 2025-07-09
textvision
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 8 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok 4Muse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 5
LMArena Elo1410.8 ↗1494.3 ↗-83.5Muse Spark 1.3
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)28% ↗epoch run38% ↗epoch run-10 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1184.2 ↗1290.2 ↗-106Muse Spark 1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)84% ↗epoch run99.2% ↗epoch run-15.2 ptMuse Spark 1.3
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)60.5% ↗81.8% ↗-21.3 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Only Grok 4 reports · 12
GPQA Diamond87% ↗epoch runnot reported——
AIME 202591.7% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)25.4% ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI-215.9% ↗not reported——
BALROG (BALROG)43.6% ↗not reported——
GPQA (no tools)87.5% ↗not reported——
HMMT 2025 (no tools)90% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)38.6% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (Jan - May)79% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)25.1% ↗not reported——
USAMO 2025 (no tools)37.5% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)45.7% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 24
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported57.8% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported75.4% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported64.1% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported81.1% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported79.6% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported78% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported82.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported95.9% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported89.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.04 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1656.6 ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported24.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4 minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok 4Muse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window256K tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$4.25 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$5.5—
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.3
Released2025-07-092026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores1729—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4 and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.