Compare / head-to-head

Kimi K2.5vsSolar Pro 3

Kimi K2.5 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window (256K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Kimi K2.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Kimi K2.5
256K tokens
Providers
2 providers
Moonshot AI · Upstage
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI · released 2026-01-27
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
26 · 14 core
Solar Pro 3
Upstage · released 2026-01-26
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.15 ↗
Output /1M
$0.6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.015
Scores
12 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkKimi K2.5Solar Pro 3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
GPQA-Diamond87.6% ↗71.92% ↗+15.7 ptKimi K2.5
Only Kimi K2.5 reports · 25
SWE-bench Verified76.8% ↗not reported——
MMLU-Pro87.1% ↗not reported——
AIME 202596.1% ↗not reported——
LMArena Elo1450.1 ↗not reported——
BrowseComp60.6% ↗not reported——
HLE-Full30.1% ↗not reported——
HLE-Full (w/ tools)50.2% ↗not reported——
HMMT 2025 (Feb)95.4% ↗not reported——
IMO-AnswerBench81.8% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (v6)85% ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1252.2 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1435.8 ↗not reported——
MMMU-Pro78.5% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)63.3% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)46.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified34.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SWE-Bench Multilingual73% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro50.7% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)73.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal Bench 2.050.8% ↗not reported——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)33% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)1198.46 ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU86.6% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)45.6% ↗not reported——
Only Solar Pro 3 reports · 11
AIME'26not reported83% ↗——
Arena-hard-v2not reported74.7% ↗——
HLEnot reported11.91% ↗——
HMMT'26not reported65.91% ↗——
IFBenchnot reported73.13% ↗——
Ko-Arena-hard-v2not reported78.2% ↗——
LCB.v1-6not reported77.73% ↗——
MMLU PRO (0shot, cot)not reported81.24% ↗——
SWE Benchnot reported28.57% ↗——
Tau2-allnot reported72.34% ↗——
Terminal Bench 2not reported10.11% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Kimi K2.5 minus Solar Pro 3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecKimi K2.5Solar Pro 3Edge
Context window256K tokens128K tokensKimi K2.5
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$0.6 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.015 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$0.75—
Modalitiestext · vision · videotextKimi K2.5
Released2026-01-272026-01-26—
Cited benchmark scores2612—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Solar Pro 3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Kimi K2.5 and Solar Pro 3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.